Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Alima2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Image:Alima2.jpg[edit]
This image is sourced to Flickr[1], where it is tagged as cc-by-sa-2.0. However, the photo is copyright 2006 Getty Images: [2] --Muchness 06:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete User does not seem to understand what copyright is. He has shots from websites, newspapers and different kinds of promotional images released under cc-by-sa. As per above I doubt it is his own photo.
- Though if one with a Flickr account could try contact him and try sort it out it would be great. --|EPO| 09:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The image has, according to the link [3] been released for Editorial use. I believe that the use of this image on Commons is justified in this regard, and does not infringe on the copyright of Getty Images due to the fact that the use of the image on Commons (in my view) meets the criteria set out by the copyright holder, Getty Images. Pursuant to this, I move that the image be kept. Matt.T.911 12:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- This image is not available under a free license – that is, the copyright holder does not permit the image to be used by anyone for any purpose. As such, it falls outside Commons' project scope. --Muchness 15:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, let's look at it another way: this image is not truly the image that the source website displays for two reasons. One: the image displayed on the source website has a "Getty Images" watermark, whereas the image on Commons does not. Two: Even if they were exactly the same image (watermark and all) there is no copyright pertaining explicitly to that image on the source website. Given that there's no copyright available, I'd be inclined to believe that the image in question is in the public domain. --Matt.T.911 15:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- This image is not available under a free license – that is, the copyright holder does not permit the image to be used by anyone for any purpose. As such, it falls outside Commons' project scope. --Muchness 15:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
deleted, obvious copyvio --Polarlys 00:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)