Commons:Deletion requests/Flickr washing 001

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Flickr washing 001|year=2024|month=January|day=15}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Flickr washing 001|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Flickr washing 001}} at the end of today's log.

Flickr washing 001[edit]

All of those images are from the same flickr account. Most images are lacking exif data and lots of images of that flickr user are copyvios. Some from getty, some adds and other stuff. Those images should never have been uploaded! --Amada44  talk to me 09:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could you be more specific which of the files you listed are from Gettys, advertisements or otherwise? Max Rebo Band"almost suspiciously excellent" 14:46, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Delete Its obvious that this is an account created to just upload random images, not self created works. This includes ALL images from that photostream. Even those photos one can think they are simple holiday photos ([1]) are not ([2]) own work by the flickr user daily sunny. Not to mention files like File:Cradled Pussy.jpg - well known photo all around the internet. An obvious case for COM:QFI, please remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses to prevent such 'flickrvios'. --Martin H. (talk) 16:43, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I added link1-link3 to give some examples where the copyright holder/author is known. This can easily be done with TinEye, also the others have TinEye hits en masse, but it doesnt bring anything here to show random websources, thats something the uploader can - and should - do himself easily. --Martin H. (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Delete all! Looks like a best-of-the-web flickr photo stream. Not convincing at all that this is a user posting own pictures for several reasons which I do not tell here for obvious reasons. Some pictures even do still have watermarks from the source: [3], [4]. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 19:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted. Masur (talk) 17:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Flickr_washing_001&oldid=44227814"